The Austin Major, kicking off in June 2025, showcased intense map play across its phases. We’ve crunched the numbers from all stages to give you the average win rates and side balance—key intel for dominating your next match!

The BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025 brought the heat with map picks shaping the meta across Group Stage, Play-ins, and Playoffs. With teams battling it out in Texas, map selection and side advantage became critical. This analysis aggregates data from all stages, offering a clear picture of which maps ruled and how sides impacted wins. It’s a goldmine for players looking to refine their strategies.

Detailed Analysis
The map pool data reveals a varied side balance, with CT dominating Nuke (64%), Train (55.7%), and Mirage (57.7%), while T sides shine on Anubis (50%), Ancient (47.3%), and Dust II (43.7%). Inferno’s near-even split (55.3% CT, 44.7% T) with 31 picks and a 59% ban rate positions it as a balanced yet contested map across all stages.

Nuke and Ancient , with higher ban rates (62% and 68%), are high-stakes maps where defensive setups and executes can decide matches. Dust II’s 35 picks and T-leaning 43.7% win rate reflect its popularity for aggressive plays. Train’s moderate play count (14) and 73% ban rate suggest teams avoid its CT-heavy layout.

Side balance offers tactical clues. Mirage and Inferno, with CT win rates of 57.7% and 55.3%, provide skill-based arenas with slight CT leans. The T performance on Anubis (50%), Ancient (47.3%), and Dust II (43.7%), contrasted with Nuke’s CT stronghold (64%), emphasizes map-specific prep. Teams likely honed CT defaults and T executes, with bans reflecting efforts to dodge tough matchups. This data will guide adjustments as the meta evolves.

The map pool for CS2 Austin Major 2025 highlights Dust II as the most played, with a T advantage on Anubis, Ancient , and Dust II, balanced by CT strength on Nuke and Train. The data showcases a dynamic meta with strategic depth.